1974 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1974 Autobianchi A 112. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1974 Autobianchi A 112.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Autobianchi A 112. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Autobianchi A 112.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Autobianchi A 112 | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Toyota |
| Model | A 112 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 902 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 63 Nm | 219 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2601 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 50 L |
