1974 BMW 1502 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1974 BMW 1502 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 1974 BMW 1502. (83 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1974 BMW 1502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1288 kg more than 1974 BMW 1502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 453 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 BMW 1502. (130 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 BMW 1502.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 BMW 1502 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 1502 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1574 cc | 6381 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 325 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 130 Nm | 583 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 2218 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 75 L |
