1974 BMW 1502 vs. 2000 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 BMW 1502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 BMW 1502 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1974 BMW 1502. (83 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1974 BMW 1502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 278 kg more than 1974 BMW 1502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (414 Nm) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 BMW 1502. (130 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 BMW 1502.
Compare all specifications:
1974 BMW 1502 | 2000 Ford Mustang | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 1502 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1974 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1574 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 414 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1208 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2580 mm |