1974 BMW 1502 vs. 2001 Ford Puma
To start off, 2001 Ford Puma is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 BMW 1502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 BMW 1502 would be higher. At 1,574 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 BMW 1502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Puma (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1974 BMW 1502. (83 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1974 BMW 1502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Puma weights approximately 105 kg more than 1974 BMW 1502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Puma (149 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 BMW 1502. (130 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 BMW 1502.
Compare all specifications:
1974 BMW 1502 | 2001 Ford Puma | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 1502 | Puma |
Year Released | 1974 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1574 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 81.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 45 L |