1974 BMW 1502 vs. 2011 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2011 Toyota Tundra is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 BMW 1502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 BMW 1502 would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Tundra (276 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1974 BMW 1502. (83 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1974 BMW 1502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 150 kg more than 1974 BMW 1502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Tundra (424 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 BMW 1502. (130 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 BMW 1502.
Compare all specifications:
1974 BMW 1502 | 2011 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 1502 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1974 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1574 cc | 4664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 424 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 100 L |