1974 BMW 2.8 vs. 1959 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1974 BMW 2.8 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Jaguar XK (220 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1974 BMW 2.8. (187 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1974 BMW 2.8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 BMW 2.8 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1959 Jaguar XK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Jaguar XK (325 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 BMW 2.8. (295 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1959 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 BMW 2.8.
Compare all specifications:
1974 BMW 2.8 | 1959 Jaguar XK | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | 2.8 | XK |
Year Released | 1974 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3293 cc | 3781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 295 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 87.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 106 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2600 mm |