1974 BMW 2.8 vs. 1999 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1999 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 BMW 2.8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 BMW 2.8 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1974 BMW 2.8. (187 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1974 BMW 2.8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 165 kg more than 1974 BMW 2.8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 BMW 2.8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 BMW 2.8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 BMW 2.8 | 1999 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 2.8 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3293 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 271 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1705 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1950 mm |
