1974 BMW 2.8 vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 BMW 2.8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 BMW 2.8 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 BMW 2.8 (187 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 BMW 2.8 should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 1974 BMW 2.8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 BMW 2.8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 BMW 2.8. (295 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 BMW 2.8.
Compare all specifications:
1974 BMW 2.8 | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 2.8 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1974 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3293 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 295 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2380 mm |