1974 BMW 2.8 vs. 2005 Cadillac DTS
To start off, 2005 Cadillac DTS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 BMW 2.8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 BMW 2.8 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac DTS (287 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1974 BMW 2.8. (187 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1974 BMW 2.8.
Because 1974 BMW 2.8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 BMW 2.8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac DTS (388 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 BMW 2.8. (295 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 BMW 2.8.
Compare all specifications:
1974 BMW 2.8 | 2005 Cadillac DTS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 2.8 | DTS |
Year Released | 1974 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3293 cc | 4565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 287 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 295 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2940 mm |