1974 BMW 2.8 vs. 2005 Volvo S60
To start off, 2005 Volvo S60 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 BMW 2.8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 BMW 2.8 would be higher. At 3,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 BMW 2.8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S60 (257 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1974 BMW 2.8. (187 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1974 BMW 2.8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 BMW 2.8 weights approximately 1 kg more than 2005 Volvo S60.
Because 1974 BMW 2.8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 BMW 2.8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo S60 (350 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 BMW 2.8. (295 Nm). This means 2005 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 BMW 2.8.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 BMW 2.8 | 2005 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | BMW | Volvo |
| Model | 2.8 | S60 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3293 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 257 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 295 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1539 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2760 mm |
