1974 BMW 2.8 vs. 2007 Chevrolet Uplander
To start off, 2007 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 BMW 2.8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 BMW 2.8 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chevrolet Uplander (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1974 BMW 2.8. (187 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet Uplander should accelerate faster than 1974 BMW 2.8.
Because 1974 BMW 2.8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 BMW 2.8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet Uplander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chevrolet Uplander (325 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 BMW 2.8. (295 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Chevrolet Uplander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 BMW 2.8.
Compare all specifications:
1974 BMW 2.8 | 2007 Chevrolet Uplander | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 2.8 | Uplander |
Year Released | 1974 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3293 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 295 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2880 mm |