1974 BMW 2.8 vs. 2009 Honda FR-V
To start off, 2009 Honda FR-V is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 BMW 2.8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 BMW 2.8 would be higher. At 3,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 BMW 2.8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 BMW 2.8 (187 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2009 Honda FR-V. (138 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 BMW 2.8 should accelerate faster than 2009 Honda FR-V.
Because 1974 BMW 2.8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 BMW 2.8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda FR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 BMW 2.8 (295 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Honda FR-V. (174 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 1974 BMW 2.8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Honda FR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1974 BMW 2.8 | 2009 Honda FR-V | |
Make | BMW | Honda |
Model | 2.8 | FR-V |
Year Released | 1974 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3293 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 295 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 87.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2120 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2690 mm |