1974 BMW 2.8 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 BMW 2.8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 BMW 2.8 would be higher. At 3,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 BMW 2.8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 BMW 2.8 (187 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (161 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 BMW 2.8 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Because 1974 BMW 2.8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 BMW 2.8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (350 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 BMW 2.8. (295 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 BMW 2.8.
Compare all specifications:
1974 BMW 2.8 | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 2.8 | Captiva |
Year Released | 1974 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3293 cc | 2231 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 295 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2707 mm |