1974 Buick Skylark vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 5,724 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Buick Skylark (150 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Condor. (114 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Buick Skylark should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Condor weights approximately 27 kg more than 1974 Buick Skylark.
Because 2003 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Buick Skylark. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Buick Skylark (366 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Condor. (195 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1974 Buick Skylark will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Buick Skylark | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | Skylark | Condor |
Year Released | 1974 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5724 cc | 2438 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1605 kg | 1632 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 70 L |