1974 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1968 Mini MK II
To start off, 1974 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mini MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mini MK II would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Brougham (193 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1968 Mini MK II. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1968 Mini MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1720 kg more than 1968 Mini MK II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Mini MK II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Cadillac Brougham | 1968 Mini MK II | |
Make | Cadillac | Mini |
Model | Brougham | MK II |
Year Released | 1974 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7732 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2330 kg | 610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 3060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2040 mm |