1974 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1969 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1974 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Brougham (193 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. (20 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1890 kg more than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Cadillac Brougham | 1969 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
Model | Brougham | Fronte |
Year Released | 1974 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 7732 cc | 356 cc |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 20 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2330 kg | 440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 3000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 1970 mm |