1974 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1972 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1974 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Brougham (193 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1972 Ford Mustang. (141 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1972 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 879 kg more than 1972 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Cadillac Brougham | 1972 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Brougham | Mustang |
Year Released | 1974 | 1972 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7732 cc | 4941 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2330 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 4820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2780 mm |