1974 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1982 Bitter SC
To start off, 1982 Bitter SC is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Brougham (193 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1982 Bitter SC. (178 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1982 Bitter SC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 980 kg more than 1982 Bitter SC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Cadillac Brougham | 1982 Bitter SC | |
Make | Cadillac | Bitter |
Model | Brougham | SC |
Year Released | 1974 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7732 cc | 2969 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 178 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2330 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 4920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2690 mm |