1974 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1997 Nissan El Grand
To start off, 1997 Nissan El Grand is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 360 kg more than 1997 Nissan El Grand.
Because 1974 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Nissan El Grand, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Cadillac Brougham | 1997 Nissan El Grand | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | Brougham | El Grand |
Year Released | 1974 | 1997 |
Engine Size | 7732 cc | 3299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2330 kg | 1970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 4750 mm |