1974 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Brougham (193 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 425 kg more than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Cadillac Brougham | 1999 Mitsubishi SUW | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | Brougham | SUW |
Year Released | 1974 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7732 cc | 1099 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2330 kg | 1905 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2630 mm |