1974 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1999 Volvo C70
To start off, 1999 Volvo C70 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Brougham (193 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1999 Volvo C70. (165 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1999 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 955 kg more than 1999 Volvo C70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Cadillac Brougham | 1999 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | Brougham | C70 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7732 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2330 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 4720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2800 mm |
