1974 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2000 Ford Puma
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Brougham (193 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2000 Ford Puma. (153 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1055 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Cadillac Brougham | 2000 Ford Puma | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Brougham | Puma |
Year Released | 1974 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7732 cc | 1679 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2330 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 3990 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2450 mm |