1974 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2000 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Brougham (193 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2000 Mazda 626. (100 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 944 kg more than 2000 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mazda 626 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Cadillac Brougham | 2000 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Brougham | 626 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7732 cc | 2496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2330 kg | 1386 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 4610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2620 mm |
