1974 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2002 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2002 Pagani Zonda is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Pagani Zonda (547 HP) has 354 more horse power than 1974 Cadillac Brougham. (193 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1974 Cadillac Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1080 kg more than 2002 Pagani Zonda.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Cadillac Brougham | 2002 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | Cadillac | Pagani |
Model | Brougham | Zonda |
Year Released | 1974 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 7732 cc | 7300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 547 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2330 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 4395 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2730 mm |