1974 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2002 Suzuki Samurai
To start off, 2002 Suzuki Samurai is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Brougham (193 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki Samurai. (62 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki Samurai. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1150 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Samurai. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Suzuki Samurai is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki Samurai will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Cadillac Brougham | 2002 Suzuki Samurai | |
Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
Model | Brougham | Samurai |
Year Released | 1974 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7732 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2330 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 4020 mm |