1974 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Brougham (193 HP) has 75 more horse power than 2003 Renault Megane. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Megane.
Because 1974 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Cadillac Brougham | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | Brougham | Megane |
Year Released | 1974 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7732 cc | 1900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5950 mm | 4510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2680 mm |