1974 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 164 more horse power than 1974 Cadillac Brougham. (193 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1974 Cadillac Brougham.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Cadillac Brougham | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | Brougham | UTE |
Year Released | 1974 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7732 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 357 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |