1974 Cadillac Calais vs. 1996 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1996 Lincoln Continental is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lincoln Continental (218 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1974 Cadillac Calais. (193 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1974 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 470 kg more than 1996 Lincoln Continental.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Cadillac Calais | 1996 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
| Model | Calais | Continental |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 218 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2220 kg | 1750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 5250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2780 mm |
