1974 Cadillac Calais vs. 1998 Ford Puma
To start off, 1998 Ford Puma is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Calais (193 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1998 Ford Puma. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1250 kg more than 1998 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Cadillac Calais | 1998 Ford Puma | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Calais | Puma |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2260 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2450 mm |
