1974 Cadillac Calais vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Calais (193 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (45 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1380 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Cadillac Calais | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
| Model | Calais | R2 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 45 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 2220 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2370 mm |
