1974 Cadillac Calais vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Calais (193 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 6. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 810 kg more than 2010 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Cadillac Calais | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Calais | 6 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2220 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 4755 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1795 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2789 mm |
