1974 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1974 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 8,191 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Eldorado (198 HP) has 158 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1065 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Cadillac Eldorado | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | Eldorado | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 8191 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2275 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3220 mm | 2540 mm |
