1974 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 1974 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 8,191 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Eldorado (198 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1141 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Cadillac Eldorado | 1963 Holden EJ | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | Eldorado | EJ |
Year Released | 1974 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8191 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2275 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3220 mm | 2680 mm |