1974 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 8,191 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Eldorado (198 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 3. (148 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 974 kg more than 2010 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Cadillac Eldorado | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Eldorado | 3 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 8191 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2275 kg | 1301 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1755 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3220 mm | 2639 mm |
