1974 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2013 Mazda CX-09
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-09 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 8,191 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-09 (269 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1974 Cadillac Eldorado. (198 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09 should accelerate faster than 1974 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 213 kg more than 2013 Mazda CX-09.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Cadillac Eldorado | 2013 Mazda CX-09 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Eldorado | CX-09 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8191 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2275 kg | 2062 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1936 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3220 mm | 2875 mm |