1974 Chevrolet Nova vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 4,299 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Chevrolet Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1974 Chevrolet Nova. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1974 Chevrolet Nova.
Because 1974 Chevrolet Nova is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Chevrolet Nova. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Chevrolet Nova (272 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1974 Chevrolet Nova will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Chevrolet Nova | 2012 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Nova | Epica |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4299 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 272 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2700 mm |
