1974 Chrysler 160 vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1974 Chrysler 160 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph 2000 (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1974 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1974 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 105 kg more than 1974 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Chrysler 160 | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
Model | 160 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1974 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |