1974 Chrysler 160 vs. 1998 Lotus GT 1
To start off, 1998 Lotus GT 1 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Lotus GT 1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus GT 1 (580 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 501 more horse power than 1974 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus GT 1 should accelerate faster than 1974 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1998 Lotus GT 1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus GT 1 (391 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Lotus GT 1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Chrysler 160 | 1998 Lotus GT 1 | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | 160 | GT 1 |
Year Released | 1974 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3506 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 580 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 391 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2320 mm |