1974 Chrysler 160 vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz E

To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz E (167 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1974 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1974 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 507 kg more than 1974 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercedes-Benz E (240 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications:

1974 Chrysler 160 2002 Mercedes-Benz E
Make Chrysler Mercedes-Benz
Model 160 E
Year Released 1974 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1639 cc 1796 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 79 HP 167 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5300 RPM
Torque 125 Nm 240 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1065 kg 1572 kg
Vehicle Length 4540 mm 4820 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2720 mm