1974 Chrysler 160 vs. 2006 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2006 Fiat Stilo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,446 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Stilo (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1974 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1974 Chrysler 160.
Because 1974 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Stilo (221 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Chrysler 160 | 2006 Fiat Stilo | |
Make | Chrysler | Fiat |
Model | 160 | Stilo |
Year Released | 1974 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1760 mm |