1974 Chrysler 160 vs. 2008 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2008 Dodge Charger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 6,059 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 346 more horse power than 1974 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1974 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Dodge Charger (570 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 445 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Chrysler 160 | 2008 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | 160 | Charger |
Year Released | 1974 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 6059 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 425 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 570 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3050 mm |