1974 Chrysler 160 vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 1340 kg more than 1974 Chrysler 160.
Because 1974 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Livina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Livina (153 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan Livina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Chrysler 160 | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | 160 | Livina |
Year Released | 1974 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 2405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2610 mm |