1974 Chrysler 160 vs. 2010 Mazda 2
To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 2 (85 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1974 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1974 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 110 kg more than 2010 Mazda 2.
Because 1974 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Chrysler 160 (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 2. (122 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1974 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Chrysler 160 | 2010 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | 160 | 2 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1347 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 122 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 955 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2500 mm |
