1974 Chrysler 160 vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (112 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1974 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1974 Chrysler 160.
Because 1974 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Megane (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Chrysler 160 | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | 160 | Megane |
Year Released | 1974 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1470 mm |