1974 Chrysler 160 vs. 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet
To start off, 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1974 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet should accelerate faster than 1974 Chrysler 160.
Because 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Chrysler 160. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet (336 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Chrysler 160 | 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | 160 | Murano CrossCabriolet |
Year Released | 1974 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 336 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4829 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1681 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2824 mm |