1974 Chrysler 160 vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Volvo C30 (101 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1974 Chrysler 160. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1974 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 386 kg more than 1974 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Chrysler 160 | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | 160 | C30 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 101 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2639 mm |