1974 Chrysler Charger vs. 1986 Mercury Sable
To start off, 1986 Mercury Sable is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mercury Sable weights approximately 70 kg more than 1974 Chrysler Charger.
Because 1974 Chrysler Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Chrysler Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Chrysler Charger | 1986 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
Model | Charger | Sable |
Year Released | 1974 | 1986 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3523 cc | 2513 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |