1974 Chrysler Charger vs. 2004 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Chrysler Charger (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Chrysler Charger (272 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1974 Chrysler Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Chrysler Charger | 2004 Holden Rodeo | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Charger | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1974 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3523 cc | 2405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 272 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3060 mm |