1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager (172 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (116 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Let's talk about torque, 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager (278 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Lotus Elan. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Lotus Elan. 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager has automatic transmission and 1968 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1968 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
| Model | Grand Voyager | Elan |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3301 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 278 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
