1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1999 Lotus M250
To start off, 1999 Lotus M250 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lotus M250 (247 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (172 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lotus M250 (321 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (278 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Lotus M250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager. 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager has automatic transmission and 1999 Lotus M250 has manual transmission. 1999 Lotus M250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1999 Lotus M250 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
| Model | Grand Voyager | M250 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3301 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 278 Nm | 321 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
